# div1_Aq_Props_QAL_K

COMMENTS:
T is average of Pumping T and Recovery T reported in source data. Duplicate test reported in Wilson (1965)


COMMENTS:
T is average of Pumping T and Recovery T reported in source data


COMMENTS:
B obtained from SPDSS T42 Configuration Maps and used to calculate K


COMMENTS:
Drawdown in pumped well=8.03ft.  (shale at 47ft)


COMMENTS:
Drawdown in pumped well=13.55ft.  (sandstone at 85), Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964)


COMMENTS:
Specific capacity at 90 min=280 gpm per ft., Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964)


COMMENTS:
Recovery test.  Static water level = 5.68ft.


COMMENTS:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 2273, Duplicate test reported in Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965),


COMMENTS:
Duplicate test reported in Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965),


COMMENTS:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 2005, Duplicate test reported in Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965),


COMMENTS:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 1016, Duplicate test reported in Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965),


COMMENTS:
Duplicate test reported in Schneider (1962)


COMMENTS:
Duplicate test reported in Wilson (1965)


COMMENTS:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 588, Duplicate test reported in Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965)


COMMENTS:
Duplicate test reported in Schneider (1962),  Wilson (1965),


COMMENTS:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 856, Duplicate test reported in Schneider (1962)


COMMENTS:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 1337, Duplicate test reported in Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965),


COMMENTS:
Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964), Schneider (1962),


COMMENTS:
Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964), Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965)


COMMENTS:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 628, Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964), Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965)


COMMENTS:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 1110, Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964), Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965)


COMMENTS:
Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964)


COMMENTS:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 561, Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964), Schneider (1962)


COMMENTS:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 214, Duplicate test reported in Schneider (1962)


COMMENTS:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 615, Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964)


COMMENTS:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 909, Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964), Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965),


COMMENTS:
Recovery test. Static water level = 12.28 ft


COMMENTS:
Recovery Test. Static water level = 14.52 ft


COMMENTS:
Recovery Test.  Static Water Level = 6.80 ft


COMMENTS:
Observation well for test at well 1023.  Radius=27ft, S=0.22;  (shale at 159 ft)


COMMENTS:
Duplicate test reported in Nelson et al. (1967)


COMMENTS:
Water level in a well 152 ft north was lowered 0.45ft during pumping of this well


COMMENTS:
Recovery test. Static water level on Dec. 20, 1954 = 4.26 ft.   (shale at 115 ft)


COMMENTS:
(shale at 39), Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964)


COMMENTS:
Drawdown in pumped well=6.95ft  (shale at 33ft)


COMMENTS:
Well seated in clay  (not to shale), Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964)


COMMENTS:
Recovery test.  Static water level=41.85ft., Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964)


COMMENTS:
Recovery test. Static water level=1.70ft., Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964)


COMMENTS:
Recovery test. Static water level=3.97ft.


COMMENTS:
Recovery test. Static water level=4.46ft.


COMMENTS:
Specific capacity at 100 min=35 gpm per ft.


COMMENTS:
Drawdown in pumped well=14.20ft.  (shale at 43), Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964)


COMMENTS:
Drawdown in pumped well=16.08ft.  (shale at 105)


COMMENTS:
Drawdown in pumped well=26.40ft. NOTE: Verify the T value; reported as 50,000 in Cherry Ck Basin Water Reources & Water Rights Study, pg 20.


COMMENTS:
B obtained from Well_depth (or Bperf) - TSWL and used to calculate K


COMMENTS:
The T value reported was average T from 1056000 gpd/ft at, from the graph of drawdown data from the pumping well and 1232000 from drawdown from well W5MW. Saturated Thickness was 57.5'


COMMENTS:
Well also known as CPVM-1. Sy is an average of values reported from source.


COMMENTS:
Specific Yield value does not reflect ultimate specific yeild, delayed-gravity drainage still occuring at end of test


COMMENTS:
Average Pumping and Recovery T from observation well is 1,026,500 ft^2/d.  S value does not reflect ultimate Sy value - still influenced by delayed yield.


COMMENTS:
Data from Tamarack Ranch Modeling Project, Tab C, Aquifer Parameters, CDOW 2003


COMMENTS:
The T value reported was average T from, 384,492gpm/ft (from the graph of drawdown data form the pumping well) 576738 gpd/ft at MW23 and 416533 gpm/ft at OM2.  Saturated thickness was 42.5


COMMENTS:
T value  reported was for the recovery period.  Tpumping was382000 gpd/ft. Saturated thickness was 77'


COMMENTS:
T value from average of pumping and observation wells, T at pumping well = 28000gpd/ft.  T at furthest observation well  = 189,100 gpd/ft. Sy value not reflective of ultimate Sy, biased by delayed gravity yield. Dr


COMMENTS:
The T value reported was the average T value based from thedrawdown and recovery stages of the tests. The saturated thickness was 16.4


COMMENTS:
T avg value reported. PumpingT was 29700.  RecoveryT was 135300


COMMENTS:
Data from Tamarack Ranch Modeling Project, Tab C, Aquifer Parameters, CDOW 2003 (USDA Test)


# div1_Aq_Props_QAL_S

COMMENTS:
T is average of Pumping T and Recovery T reported in source data. Duplicate test reported in Wilson (1965)


COMMENTS:
T is average of Pumping T and Recovery T reported in source data


COMMENTS:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 2273, Duplicate test reported in Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965),


COMMENTS:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 2005, Duplicate test reported in Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965),


COMMENTS:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 1016, Duplicate test reported in Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965),


COMMENTS:
Duplicate test reported in Schneider (1962)


COMMENTS:
Duplicate test reported in Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965),


COMMENTS:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 588, Duplicate test reported in Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965)


COMMENTS:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 1337, Duplicate test reported in Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965),


COMMENTS:
Duplicate test reported in Schneider (1962),  Wilson (1965),


COMMENTS:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 628, Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964), Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965)


COMMENTS:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 1110, Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964), Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965)


COMMENTS:
Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964)


COMMENTS:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 561, Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964), Schneider (1962)


COMMENTS:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 615, Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964)


COMMENTS:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 909, Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964), Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965),


COMMENTS:
Observation well for test at well 1023.  Radius=27ft, S=0.22;  (shale at 159 ft)


COMMENTS:
Well also known as CPVM-1. Sy is an average of values reported from source.


COMMENTS:
Specific Yield value does not reflect ultimate specific yeild, delayed-gravity drainage still occuring at end of test


COMMENTS:
Average Pumping and Recovery T from observation well is 1,026,500 ft^2/d.  S value does not reflect ultimate Sy value - still influenced by delayed yield.


COMMENTS:
Data from Tamarack Ranch Modeling Project, Tab C, Aquifer Parameters, CDOW 2003


COMMENTS:
T value from average of pumping and observation wells, T at pumping well = 28000gpd/ft.  T at furthest observation well  = 189,100 gpd/ft. Sy value not reflective of ultimate Sy, biased by delayed gravity yield. Dr


COMMENTS:
Data from Tamarack Ranch Modeling Project, Tab C, Aquifer Parameters, CDOW 2003 (USDA Test)


# div1_Aq_Props_QAL_Storativity

comments:
Duplicate test reported in Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965),


comments:
Duplicate test reported in Schneider (1962)


comments:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 588, Duplicate test reported in Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965)


comments:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 1337, Duplicate test reported in Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965),


comments:
T is average of Pumping T and Recovery T reported in source data. Duplicate test reported in Wilson (1965)


comments:
T is average of Pumping T and Recovery T reported in source data


comments:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 2273, Duplicate test reported in Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965),


comments:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 2005, Duplicate test reported in Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965),


comments:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 1016, Duplicate test reported in Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965),


comments:
Duplicate test reported in Schneider (1962),  Wilson (1965),


comments:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 628, Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964), Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965)


comments:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 1110, Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964), Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965)


comments:
Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964)


comments:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 561, Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964), Schneider (1962)


comments:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 615, Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964)


comments:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 909, Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964), Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965),


comments:
Observation well for test at well 1023.  Radius=27ft, S=0.22;  (shale at 159 ft)


comments:
Specific Yield value does not reflect ultimate specific yeild, delayed-gravity drainage still occuring at end of test


comments:
T value from average of pumping and observation wells, T at pumping well = 28000gpd/ft.  T at furthest observation well  = 189,100 gpd/ft. Sy value not reflective of ultimate Sy, biased by delayed gravity yield. Drill Log produces B of 97 (108,bedrock,-1


comments:
Well also known as CPVM-1. Sy is an average of values reported from source.


comments:
Data from Tamarack Ranch Modeling Project, Tab C, Aquifer Parameters, CDOW 2003 (USDA test)


comments:
Data from Tamarack Ranch Modeling Project, Tab C, Aquifer Parameters, CDOW 2003


comments:
Average Pumping and Recovery T from observation well is 1,026,500 ft^2/d.  Sy value does not reflect ultimate Sy value - still influenced by delayed yield.


comments:
Location determined by hand from Thornton report, plate 1, B from T42 grid


comments:
Lab data not in Hydrobase due to limitations on housing samples from multiple samples from single borehole


# div1_Aq_Props_QAL_T

COMMENTS:
T is average of Pumping T and Recovery T reported in source data. Duplicate test reported in Wilson (1965)


COMMENTS:
T is average of Pumping T and Recovery T reported in source data


COMMENTS:
B obtained from SPDSS T42 Configuration Maps and used to calculate K


COMMENTS:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 214, Duplicate test reported in Schneider (1962)


COMMENTS:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 615, Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964)


COMMENTS:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 909, Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964), Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965),


COMMENTS:
Recovery test. Static water level = 12.28 ft


COMMENTS:
Recovery Test. Static water level = 14.52 ft


COMMENTS:
Recovery Test.  Static Water Level = 6.80 ft


COMMENTS:
Observation well for test at well 1023.  Radius=27ft, S=0.22;  (shale at 159 ft)


COMMENTS:
Duplicate test reported in Nelson et al. (1967)


COMMENTS:
Water level in a well 152 ft north was lowered 0.45ft during pumping of this well


COMMENTS:
Recovery test. Static water level on Dec. 20, 1954 = 4.26 ft.   (shale at 115 ft)


COMMENTS:
(shale at 39), Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964)


COMMENTS:
Drawdown in pumped well=6.95ft  (shale at 33ft)


COMMENTS:
Well seated in clay  (not to shale), Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964)


COMMENTS:
Recovery test.  Static water level=41.85ft., Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964)


COMMENTS:
Recovery test. Static water level=1.70ft., Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964)


COMMENTS:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 2273, Duplicate test reported in Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965),


COMMENTS:
Duplicate test reported in Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965),


COMMENTS:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 2005, Duplicate test reported in Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965),


COMMENTS:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 1016, Duplicate test reported in Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965),


COMMENTS:
Duplicate test reported in Schneider (1962)


COMMENTS:
Duplicate test reported in Wilson (1965)


COMMENTS:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 588, Duplicate test reported in Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965)


COMMENTS:
Duplicate test reported in Schneider (1962),  Wilson (1965),


COMMENTS:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 856, Duplicate test reported in Schneider (1962)


COMMENTS:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 1337, Duplicate test reported in Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965),


COMMENTS:
Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964), Schneider (1962),


COMMENTS:
Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964), Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965)


COMMENTS:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 628, Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964), Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965)


COMMENTS:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 1110, Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964), Schneider (1962), Wilson (1965)


COMMENTS:
Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964)


COMMENTS:
K_ft/d of sand/gravel only- 561, Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964), Schneider (1962)


COMMENTS:
Recovery test. Static water level=3.97ft.


COMMENTS:
Recovery test. Static water level=4.46ft.


COMMENTS:
Specific capacity at 100 min=35 gpm per ft.


COMMENTS:
Drawdown in pumped well=14.20ft.  (shale at 43), Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964)


COMMENTS:
Drawdown in pumped well=16.08ft.  (shale at 105)


COMMENTS:
Drawdown in pumped well=26.40ft. NOTE: Verify the T value; reported as 50,000 in Cherry Ck Basin Water Reources & Water Rights Study, pg 20.


COMMENTS:
Drawdown in pumped well=8.03ft.  (shale at 47ft)


COMMENTS:
Drawdown in pumped well=13.55ft.  (sandstone at 85), Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964)


COMMENTS:
Specific capacity at 90 min=280 gpm per ft., Duplicate test reported in McConaghy et al. (1964)


COMMENTS:
Recovery test.  Static water level = 5.68ft.


COMMENTS:
B obtained from Well_depth (or Bperf) - TSWL and used to calculate K


COMMENTS:
The T value reported was average T from 1056000 gpd/ft at, from the graph of drawdown data from the pumping well and 1232000 from drawdown from well W5MW. Saturated Thickness was 57.5'


COMMENTS:
Well also known as CPVM-1. Sy is an average of values reported from source.


COMMENTS:
Specific Yield value does not reflect ultimate specific yeild, delayed-gravity drainage still occuring at end of test


COMMENTS:
Average Pumping and Recovery T from observation well is 1,026,500 ft^2/d.  S value does not reflect ultimate Sy value - still influenced by delayed yield.


COMMENTS:
Data from Tamarack Ranch Modeling Project, Tab C, Aquifer Parameters, CDOW 2003


COMMENTS:
The T value reported was average T from, 384,492gpm/ft (from the graph of drawdown data form the pumping well) 576738 gpd/ft at MW23 and 416533 gpm/ft at OM2.  Saturated thickness was 42.5


COMMENTS:
T value  reported was for the recovery period.  Tpumping was382000 gpd/ft. Saturated thickness was 77'


COMMENTS:
T value from average of pumping and observation wells, T at pumping well = 28000gpd/ft.  T at furthest observation well  = 189,100 gpd/ft. Sy value not reflective of ultimate Sy, biased by delayed gravity yield. Dr


COMMENTS:
The T value reported was the average T value based from thedrawdown and recovery stages of the tests. The saturated thickness was 16.4


COMMENTS:
T avg value reported. PumpingT was 29700.  RecoveryT was 135300


COMMENTS:
Data from Tamarack Ranch Modeling Project, Tab C, Aquifer Parameters, CDOW 2003 (USDA Test)


