# div1_aq_props_KA_LKA_K

COMMENTS:
Duplicate test reported in Robson (1983) Figure 6, B= T/K


COMMENTS:
B obtained from SPDSS T42 Configuration Maps and used to calculate K


COMMENTS:
Duplicate test reported in Robson (1983) Figure 6,


COMMENTS:
B obtained from SPDSS T37 and used to calculated K


COMMENTS:
B = (bperf-tperf)/Aquifer_Thickness*Sand_Thickness_from_P2_T42_grids (used to calculate K)


COMMENTS:
B = Sand_Thickness from P2_T42 grids: (bperf-tperf)>Aquifer Thickness (used to calculate K)


COMMENTS:
B obtained from HydroBase Geophlogs table and used to calculate K


COMMENTS:
B from HydroBase Geophlogs table and used to calculate K


COMMENTS:
B=T/K, Duplicate test reported in CH2MHill (1991)


COMMENTS:
Duplicate test reported in CH2MHill (1991), B= T/K


COMMENTS:
Tavg value reported.Stated that the storage coefficient assigned to the Arapahoe aquifer by the SEO is 0.17


COMMENTS:
B=BPERF-TPERF, Duplicate test reported in Lapey (2001),


COMMENTS:
Tranmissivity values from e-mail received by AH


COMMENTS:
Value of Transmissivity is Tavg. B value from the SEO geophysical database


COMMENTS:
B from Woodmoor #11 Geophysical Log Interpretation


COMMENTS:
Static Water level on permit was 1032 and Pump Rate, 698gpm


COMMENTS:
B=T/K, Duplicate test reported in CH2MHill (1991), Storativity data reported in CH2MHill (1991)


COMMENTS:
The values reported are from late time data using the Jacobs Straight-line.  Earlier time data is T value of 553gpd/ft. Using the Theis method early T value 573 gpd/ft and the late T value 280 gpd/ft


COMMENTS:
Recovery T=4995 gpd/ft.  Value reported was drawdown data


COMMENTS:
Also reported, gross Aquifer Thickness 478ft, Saturated Thick 230


COMMENTS:
Value of Transmissivity is from recovery period


COMMENTS:
Value of Transmissivity is from average of pumping and recovery periods


COMMENTS:
T avg value reported. Also included in this report from the constant rate test were values of T of 1176 gpd/ft for the drawdown portion of the test


COMMENTS:
Tavg value reported. Also included in this report from the constant rate test were values of T of 4132 gpd/ft for the drawdown portion of the test  The T reported was calculated from the recovery data.


# div1_aq_props_KA_LKA_S

COMMENTS:
B=T/K, Duplicate test reported in CH2MHill (1991), Storativity data reported in CH2MHill (1991)


COMMENTS:
Value of Transmissivity is Tavg. B value from the SEO geophysical database


# div1_aq_props_KA_LKA_Sy

COMMENTS:
Duplicate test reported in Robson (1983) Figure 6,


# div1_aq_props_KLF_K

COMMENTS:
The screened interval was used for b to calculate T=b*K, Duplicate test reported in Robson (1983) Figure 7,


COMMENTS:
B obtained from SPDSS T42 Configuration Maps and used to calculate K


COMMENTS:
Duplicate test reported in Robson (1983) Figure 7,


COMMENTS:
B obtained from HydroBase Geophlogs table and used to calculate K


COMMENTS:
Also taps the Fox Hills Sandstone. Radius of well = 0.33 ft, S = 0.004. Saturated thickness taken from logs., Duplicate test reported in Robson (1983) Figure 7,


COMMENTS:
Also taps the Fox Hills Sandstone. Radius of well = 0.40 ft. Saturated thickness determined from logs.


COMMENTS:
Also taps the Fox Hills Sandstone. Radius of well = 0.375 ft, S = 0.003. Saturated thickness taken from logs.


COMMENTS:
Recovery test. Static water level=182.50 ft. Also taps the Fox Hills Sandstone.  Saturated thickness taken from logs.


COMMENTS:
Saturated thickness determined from logs.Drawdown, Duplicate test reported in Robson (1983) Figure 7,


COMMENTS:
Saturated thickness determined from logs. Drawdown, Duplicate test reported in Robson (1983) Figure 7,


COMMENTS:
Recovery test. Static water=14.20ft. Specific capacity for test=0.4 gpm per ft. Saturated thickness from logs., Duplicate test reported in Robson (1983) Figure 7,


COMMENTS:
Water level in a well 185ft north was not lowered by the pumping of this well. Saturated thickness determined from logs. Drawdown, Duplicate test reported in Robson (1983) Figure 7


COMMENTS:
Saturated thickness determined from logs. Drawdown


COMMENTS:
B = (bperf-tperf)/Aquifer_Thickness*Sand_Thickness_from_P2_T42_grids (used to calculate K)


COMMENTS:
B from P2 Task 42 sand grids and used to calculate K


COMMENTS:
B = Sand_Thickness from P2_T42 grids: (bperf-tperf)>Aquifer Thickness (used to calculate K)


COMMENTS:
B from HydroBase Geophlogs table and used to calculate K


COMMENTS:
B=T/K, Duplicate test reported in CH2MHill (1991), Storativity data reported in CH2MHill (1991)


COMMENTS:
B=T/K, Duplicate test reported in CH2MHill (1991)


COMMENTS:
Storativity value may be for inside well


COMMENTS:
B=BPERF-TPERF, Duplicate test reported in Lapey (2001),


COMMENTS:
Two Transmissivity values were included, 2200gpd/ft(drawdown, 2330gpd/ft(recovery


# div1_aq_props_KLF_S

COMMENTS:
The screened interval was used for b to calculate T=b*K, Duplicate test reported in Robson (1983) Figure 7,


COMMENTS:
Also taps the Fox Hills Sandstone. Radius of well = 0.33 ft, S = 0.004. Saturated thickness taken from logs., Duplicate test reported in Robson (1983) Figure 7,


COMMENTS:
Also taps the Fox Hills Sandstone. Radius of well = 0.375 ft, S = 0.003. Saturated thickness taken from logs.


COMMENTS:
B=T/K, Duplicate test reported in CH2MHill (1991), Storativity data reported in CH2MHill (1991)


COMMENTS:
Storativity value may be for inside well


# div1_aq_props_KLF_Sy

COMMENTS:
Duplicate test reported in Robson (1983) Figure 7,


# div1_aq_props_TDW_LTDW_K

COMMENTS:
B obtained from SPDSS T42 Configuration Maps and used to calculate K


AQUIFER_CO:
Aquifer designation determined by location (X,Y) and aquifer extents defined by SB-5 Denv

COMMENTS:
Duplicate test reported in Robson (1983) Figure 4,


COMMENTS:
B = (bperf-tperf)/Aquifer_Thickness*Sand_Thickness_from_P2_T42_grids (used to calculate K)


COMMENTS:
B = Sand_Thickness from P2_T42 grids: (bperf-tperf)>Aquifer Thickness (used to calculate K)


COMMENTS:
B=BPERF-TPERF, Duplicate test reported in Lapey (2001),


COMMENTS:
B from HydroBase Geophlogs table and used to calculate K


COMMENTS:
Tranmissivity values from e-mail received by AH


# div1_aq_props_TDW_LTDW_Sy

AQUIFER_CO:
Aquifer designation determined by location (X,Y) and aquifer extents defined by SB-5 Denv

COMMENTS:
Duplicate test reported in Robson (1983) Figure 4,


# div1_aq_props_TKD_K

COMMENTS:
B obtained from SPDSS T42 Configuration Maps and used to calculate K


COMMENTS:
Duplicate test reported in Robson (1983) Figure 5,


COMMENTS:
B obtained from HydroBase Geophlogs table and used to calculate K


COMMENTS:
B = (bperf-tperf)/Aquifer_Thickness*Sand_Thickness_from_P2_T42_grids (used to calculate K)


COMMENTS:
B = Sand_Thickness from P2_T42 grids: (bperf-tperf)>Aquifer Thickness (used to calculate K)


COMMENTS:
B from HydroBase Geophlogs table and used to calculate K


COMMENTS:
B=T/K, Duplicate test reported in CH2MHill (1991)


COMMENTS:
Duplicate test reported in CH2MHill (1991), B= T/K


COMMENTS:
T avg value reported.T value is recovery period, T drawdown is 2246 gal/d/ft


COMMENTS:
B=BPERF-TPERF, Duplicate test reported in Lapey (2001),


COMMENTS:
Well was originally filed under Permit #53701-F.  Tavg of early and late time data.


COMMENTS:
Tranmissivity values from e-mail received by AH,Also included is a T value of 2887 gpd/ft


COMMENTS:
Tranmissivity values from e-mail received by AH


COMMENTS:
T avg value reported. Also included in this report from the constant rate test were values of T of 1566 gpd/ft for the early time data and 340gpd/ft for the latetime data.


# div1_aq_props_TKD_Sy

COMMENTS:
Duplicate test reported in Robson (1983) Figure 5,


# div1_aq_props_UKA_K

COMMENTS:
Duplicate test reported in Robson (1983) Figure 6, B= T/K


COMMENTS:
B obtained from SPDSS T42 Configuration Maps and used to calculate K


COMMENTS:
Duplicate test reported in Robson (1983) Figure 6,


COMMENTS:
Measured recovery of head. Saturated thickness determined from logs.  Static water level=+20.75ft., Duplicate test reported in Robson (1983) Figure 6


COMMENTS:
B = (bperf-tperf)/Aquifer_Thickness*Sand_Thickness_from_P2_T42_grids (used to calculate K)


COMMENTS:
B = Sand_Thickness from P2_T42 grids: (bperf-tperf)>Aquifer Thickness (used to calculate K)


COMMENTS:
sand vf gr dark gry v shy v slty tr mica


COMMENTS:
B from HydroBase Geophlogs table and used to calculate K


# div1_aq_props_UKA_Sy

COMMENTS:
Duplicate test reported in Robson (1983) Figure 6,


# div1_aq_props_UTDW_K

COMMENTS:
B obtained from SPDSS T42 Configuration Maps and used to calculate K


AQUIFER_CO:
Aquifer designation determined by location (X,Y) and aquifer extents defined by SB-5 Denv

COMMENTS:
Duplicate test reported in Robson (1983) Figure 4,


COMMENTS:
B = bperf-tperf (UTDW only) and used to calculate K


# div1_aq_props_UTDW_Sy

AQUIFER_CO:
Aquifer designation determined by location (X,Y) and aquifer extents defined by SB-5 Denv

COMMENTS:
Duplicate test reported in Robson (1983) Figure 4,


# div1_geophlogs_kab_picks

WELL_NAME:
GREATER BRIGHTON FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT


COMMENT:
BASE OF Ka NOT LOGGED, HOWEVER, TD IS AT OR NEAR BASE OF Ka


# div1_geophlogs_kals_picks

WELL_NAME:
GREATER BRIGHTON FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT


COMMENT:
NET SD FROM PARTIAL PENETRATION, LOGGED ONLY TO 421'


# div1_geophlogs_kalt_picks

WELL_NAME:
GREATER BRIGHTON FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT


COMMENT:
NET SD FROM PARTIAL PENETRATION, LOGGED ONLY TO 421'


# div1_geophlogs_kas_picks

WELL_NAME:
GREATER BRIGHTON FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT


COMMENT:
NET SD FROM PARTIAL PENETRATION, CAN'T SEPARATE Ka AT THIS LOCATION


COMMENT:
BASE OF Ka NOT LOGGED, HOWEVER, TD IS AT OR NEAR BASE OF Ka


# div1_geophlogs_kat_picks

COMMENT:
NET SD FROM PARTIAL PENETRATION, CAN'T SEPARATE Ka AT THIS LOCATION


COMMENT:
BASE OF Ka NOT LOGGED, HOWEVER, TD IS AT OR NEAR BASE OF Ka


# div1_geophlogs_klfs_picks

WELL_NAME:
GREATER BRIGHTON FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT


COMMENT:
NET SD FROM PARTIAL PENETRATION, TD AT OR NEAR BASE OF Klf


# div1_geophlogs_klft_picks

WELL_NAME:
GREATER BRIGHTON FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT


COMMENT:
NET SD FROM PARTIAL PENETRATION, TD AT OR NEAR BASE OF Klf


# div1_geophlogs_tdwb_picks

COMMENT:
NET SD COUNTS QUESTIONALBLE, LOG RESPONSE LOOK STRANGE


COMMENT:
FORMATION ELEVATIONS DETERMINED FROM THE TRUE VERTICAL DEPTH LOG


# div1_geophlogs_tdwls_picks

COMMENT:
FORMATION ELEVATIONS DETERMINED FROM THE TRUE VERTICAL DEPTH LOG


# div1_geophlogs_tdwlt_picks

COMMENT:
FORMATION ELEVATIONS DETERMINED FROM THE TRUE VERTICAL DEPTH LOG


# div1_geophlogs_tdws_picks

COMMENT:
NET SD FROM PARTIAL PENETRATION, ALL uTdw


COMMENT:
NET SD COUNTS QUESTIONALBLE, LOG RESPONSE LOOK STRANGE


# div1_geophlogs_tdwt_picks

COMMENT:
NET SD FROM PARTIAL PENETRATION, ALL uTdw


COMMENT:
SANDS DOWN TO ABOUT 400' PROBABLY NOT SATURATED


COMMENT:
NET SD COUNTS QUESTIONALBLE, LOG RESPONSE LOOK STRANGE


COMMENT:
THIS LOG IS FROM A DIRECTIONAL WELL OF A PAIR OF WELLS


# div1_geophlogs_tdwub_picks

COMMENT:
INCOMPLETE ANALYSIS, QUESTIONABLE LOG, TOOL MALFUNCTION


COMMENT:
SANDS DOWN TO ABOUT 400' PROBABLY NOT SATURATED


COMMENT:
THIS LOG IS FROM A DIRECTIONAL WELL OF A PAIR OF WELLS


# div1_geophlogs_tdwus_picks

COMMENT:
NET SD FROM PARTIAL PENETRATION, ALL uTdw


COMMENT:
SANDS DOWN TO ABOUT 400' PROBABLY NOT SATURATED


